Context: Luke 22 opens the passion narrative by setting the entire drama inside Israel's spring feast: “Now the Feast of Unleavened Bread, called the Passover, was approaching” (v. 1). Luke's note that the two feasts' names had merged reflects first-century usage — the seven days of Unleavened Bread and the Passover sacrifice had become one festival in popular speech — and it signals that everything that follows happens within the feast of purged leaven. The dating in verse 7 is precise: “Then came the day of Unleavened Bread on which the Passover lamb was to be sacrificed.” Jesus sends Peter and John to “prepare for us to eat the Passover” (v. 8); the preparation of a Passover room in Jerusalem necessarily included the removal of all leaven and the provision of unleavened bread (Exodus 12:15-20; Deuteronomy 16:3-4). At table Jesus declares His eager desire to eat “this Passover” before His suffering (v. 15) and announces that He will not eat it again “until it is fulfilled in the kingdom of God” (v. 16) — the feast itself, He says, awaits fulfillment. Then comes the institution: “And He took the bread, gave thanks and broke it, and gave it to them, saying, ‘This is My body, given for you; do this in remembrance of Me’” (v. 19), and after supper, “This cup is the new covenant in My blood, which is poured out for you” (v. 20). The bread Jesus took, by the feast's own law, was unleavened bread (maṣṣâ/ἄζυμος) — the only bread permitted in that room on that night.
Greek Key Terms:
Connections:
Christological Connection: In its own context, Luke 22:7-20 narrates the most carefully dated meal in the Gospel: the Passover of the day of Unleavened Bread, prepared according to the feast's law, eaten by the true Israelite with His twelve. The passage teaches that Jesus deliberately chose this feast — not Tabernacles, not Weeks, not an ordinary evening — as the stage for interpreting His death and instituting the church's meal. Everything in the room carries Exodus freight: the lamb sacrificed that afternoon, the bread without leaven, the cups of the seder, the language of remembrance. Jesus does not abolish the feast; He fills it. "I will not eat it again until it is fulfilled in the kingdom of God" (v. 16) declares that the feast was always reaching toward something, and that the something has now arrived at the table.
This is the redemptive-historical hinge of the Unleavened Bread trajectory. When Jesus takes the feast's own unleavened bread and says, "This is My body, given for you" (v. 19), the maṣṣâ of Exodus passes into the possession of the new covenant community: the bread Israel ate in memory of the Exodus becomes the bread the church eats in memory of the greater Exodus He accomplishes at Jerusalem (Luke 9:31). The identification is not that Christ is "the unleavened bread" as a freestanding type — the feast's symbolic freight is purity, and it is Christ's sinlessness that the broken unleavened loaf now carries to the church — but that the feast's bread becomes the vehicle of His self-gift. The cup makes the escalation explicit: where Moses sprinkled "the blood of the covenant" (Exodus 24:8), Jesus pours out "the new covenant in My blood" (v. 20), the covenant Jeremiah promised (Jeremiah 31:31-34), in which sin is not merely purged from houses but forgiven and the law written on hearts. The hinge prepares Paul's application directly: because the Lamb has been sacrificed at this feast, "let us therefore celebrate the festival... with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth" (1 Corinthians 5:7-8) — the feast Jesus carried into the new covenant is the feast the church now keeps perpetually.
Already/not-yet: already, the church eats this meal "in remembrance" of the accomplished sacrifice and proclaims the Lord's death (1 Corinthians 11:26), living as the unleavened people the meal constitutes; not yet, Jesus' own vow — "I will not eat it again until it is fulfilled in the kingdom of God" (v. 16) — keeps the table eschatologically open, awaiting the marriage supper of the Lamb (Revelation 19:9), when the fellowship inaugurated in the upper room is consummated and the feast is kept with no leaven anywhere, forever.
Connection Method(s): Redemptive-Historical Progression — this is the primary method: the passage is the hinge event in the history of redemption where the Exodus feast passes into the new covenant meal; Luke's deliberate dating (vv. 1, 7) locates the institution of the Supper inside the Feast of Unleavened Bread, and Jesus Himself frames the transition as fulfillment ("until it is fulfilled in the kingdom of God," v. 16). Also Promise-Fulfillment — "the new covenant in My blood" (v. 20) is the verbal fulfillment of Jeremiah 31:31's explicit promise. Also Typology (Direct Type, Backward-Looking, per the parent trajectory) — the divinely instituted feast prefigures Christ and His people's purity; this passage supplies the historical moment of transfer that 1 Corinthians 5:7-8 interprets retrospectively. The five characteristics hold for the feast-type as it runs through this text: analogical correspondence (purged leaven and pure bread / the sinless Christ given for His people), historicity (the feast and the Supper are both historical realities), escalation (annual memorial of Egypt → perpetual memorial of the cross; blood of animals at Sinai → blood of the Son), pointing-forwardness (backward-looking: Israel saw purity symbolism, not messianic promise; the Christological import is recognized from the NT), and retrospective interpretation (Jesus' own words at the table and Paul's application make the connection explicit). Anti-default check: typology alone would understate this passage — the text's center of gravity is the redemptive-historical transfer and the covenant promise fulfilled, with the feast-type carried along inside both.
Trajectory Table: 165 - Unleavened Bread (Purity and Sincerity)