How to read this page

An Intertextuality Pair — one connection between two passages, shown as linked verse cards: the Later text and the Earlier text it quotes, alludes to or echoes. The Significance essay explains why the link matters and where it points in Christ.

Reference Type— how explicit the link is: Quotation, Allusion, or Echo
Connection Method(s)— how it carries meaning: e.g. Typology, Promise-Fulfillment, Analogy, Longitudinal Theme
Found via— where the connection was identified, e.g. the Treasury of Scripture Knowledge or an Anchor-Text Network

Graph View — tap the constellation icon in the top bar to see this page's connections as a web of light: gold points are passages, and the coloured threads are the connection types. Click any type in the graph's own legend to filter it in or out, and use the expand control for the full-screen night sky.

New to a term? The Glossary explains every abbreviation and term on the site in plain words.

Intertextuality Pair

Luke 21:6 → 2 Kings 25:1

Echo

Later text

Luke 21:6BSB

“As for what you see here, the time will come when not one stone will be left on another; every one will be thrown down.”

Earlier text

2 Kings 25:1BSB

So in the ninth year of Zedekiah’s reign, on the tenth day of the tenth month, Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon marched against Jerusalem with his entire army. They encamped outside the city and built a siege wall all around it.

+ 1 more earlier text

Earlier text

2 Kings 25:9-10BSB

He burned down the house of the LORD, the royal palace, and all the houses of Jerusalem—every significant building. And the whole army of the Chaldeans under the captain of the guard broke down the walls around Jerusalem.

Walk the Square · a single-voice walk of this pair around the Clowney square13:31

Significance

Jesus' answer to the disciples admiring the temple's beautiful stones — "the time will come when not one stone will be left on another; every one will be thrown down" — is not a quotation of 2 Kings 25 and shares no distinctive vocabulary with it. What it shares is a precedent. 2 Kings 25:1-10 is the canonical account of the only previous destruction of the house of God: the siege wall, the breach, the burning of the temple, the dismantling of the walls of Jerusalem by the captain of the guard. That event is the fixed reference point in Israel's memory for what it means for God to abandon his own sanctuary to an army, and Jeremiah and Ezekiel had said in advance that it would happen and why. When Jesus predicts a second dismantling, he is speaking into a category the Old Testament has already established.

Found via: Treasury of Scripture Knowledge
Reference Type: Echo
Connection Method(s): Redemptive-Historical Progression + Analogy

The relation is therefore Redemptive-Historical Progression rather than citation: the second temple stands in the same conditional relation to covenant faithfulness as the first, and Solomon himself had said so at its dedication — if Israel turns away, "this house will become a heap of rubble" (1 Kings 9:6-9). Luke's own narrative makes the parallel structural, not incidental: Jesus weeps over the city and describes an encircling siege wall in terms that track 2 Kings 25:1 closely (Luke 19:43-44), and the Lukan cause of the coming ruin — "because you did not recognize the time of your visitation" — occupies exactly the place that idolatry and covenant breach occupy in the Kings account. The added element is Analogy: as God did then, so God does now, and for the same kind of reason.

But the analogy is not symmetrical, and that asymmetry is where the passage becomes gospel rather than merely history repeating. In 587 BC the temple fell and the presence of God departed with it, and Israel waited seventy years for a house to be rebuilt. Here the One speaking the sentence over the building is himself the temple that will be destroyed and raised in three days. The stones come down because what they were for has arrived in person and is standing in the court. Luke will show the veil torn from top to bottom at the moment Jesus dies (Luke 23:45), and the disciples afterward continually in the temple praising God (Luke 24:53) — not because the building still matters, but because the access it once rationed has been thrown open. The right response to Luke 21:6 is therefore not nostalgia for beautiful stones but desire for the better house: the Lord who cannot be dismantled, in whom God is met without a courtyard, a curtain, or a wall.