Later text
Acts 11:3BSB
and said, “You visited uncircumcised men and ate with them.”
Intertextuality Pair
Echo
Later text
Acts 11:3BSB
and said, “You visited uncircumcised men and ate with them.”
Earlier text
"We cannot do such a thing," they said. "To give our sister to an uncircumcised man would be a disgrace to us.
The Jerusalem believers' objection — "You visited uncircumcised men and ate with them" (Acts 11:3) — voices the ancient boundary marked by the word "uncircumcised," which from the patriarchs on branded the outsider unfit for covenant fellowship: "To give our sister to an uncircumcised man would be a disgrace to us" (Genesis 34:14). Circumcision was the covenant sign, and to eat with the uncircumcised was to breach the separation it enforced. Peter's defense is that God Himself has erased the disgrace — what God has cleansed no one may call unclean (Acts 10:15) — for the true circumcision is now of the heart, by the Spirit (Romans 2:29), accomplished in Christ (Colossians 2:11). The connection is analogical: the old idiom of exclusion is invoked precisely to announce its abolition in the gospel that seats Jew and Gentile at one table.