Later text
If I fought wild beasts in Ephesus for human motives, what did I gain? If the dead are not raised, "Let us eat and drink, for tomorrow we die."
Intertextuality Pair
Allusion
Later text
If I fought wild beasts in Ephesus for human motives, what did I gain? If the dead are not raised, "Let us eat and drink, for tomorrow we die."
Earlier text
Isaiah 22:13BSB
But look, there is joy and gladness, butchering of cattle and slaughtering of sheep, eating of meat and drinking of wine: “Let us eat and drink, for tomorrow we die!”
Isaiah 22:13 condemns Jerusalem's response to impending judgment - instead of repenting, they feasted hedonistically. Paul applies this to argue that denying resurrection produces the same moral outcome: if death is final, ethics collapse into "eat, drink, be merry." The quotation establishes resurrection's ethical necessity - only if death is conquered does self-sacrifice for Christ make sense. This reveals Paul's integrated theology: doctrine and ethics are inseparable. Christian morality (self-denial, suffering for the gospel, sexual purity) depends on eschatological hope. Without resurrection, Christian ethics are irrational. The text also shows Paul's evangelistic concern: false teaching about resurrection destroys not only doctrine but also moral transformation.