How to read this page

An Intertextuality Pair — one connection between two passages, shown as linked verse cards: the Later text and the Earlier text it quotes, alludes to or echoes. The Significance essay explains why the link matters and where it points in Christ.

Reference Type— how explicit the link is: Quotation, Allusion, or Echo
Connection Method(s)— how it carries meaning: e.g. Typology, Promise-Fulfillment, Analogy, Longitudinal Theme
Found via— where the connection was identified, e.g. the Treasury of Scripture Knowledge or an Anchor-Text Network

Graph View — tap the constellation icon in the top bar to see this page's connections as a web of light: gold points are passages, and the coloured threads are the connection types. Click any type in the graph's own legend to filter it in or out, and use the expand control for the full-screen night sky.

New to a term? The Glossary explains every abbreviation and term on the site in plain words.

Intertextuality Pair

1 Samuel 21:4 → Leviticus 10:10-11

Echo

Later text

1 Samuel 21:4BSB

"There is no common bread on hand," the priest replied, "but there is some consecrated bread—provided that the young men have kept themselves from women."

Earlier text

Leviticus 10:10-11BSB

You must distinguish between the holy and the common, between the clean and the unclean, so that you may teach the Israelites all the statutes that the LORD has given them through Moses."

Significance

Ahimelech's careful questioning of David about ritual purity before distributing the consecrated bread enacts the priestly mandate from Leviticus 10:10-11: "You must distinguish between the holy and the common, between the clean and the unclean" (וּלֲהַבְדִּיל בֵּין הַקֹּדֶשׁ וּבֵין הַחֹל וּבֵין הַטָּמֵא וּבֵין הַטָּהוֹר). The priest exercises exactly the discernment Leviticus requires, determining whether David's men qualify to eat what is sacred. This episode illustrates Torah being applied through priestly judgment to an unprecedented situation, showing how the Levitical system was designed to be interpreted and applied rather than merely recited. The mandate is twofold in Leviticus itself — priests must both distinguish holy from common and teach Israel God's statutes — and Ahimelech's identification of the showbread as לֶחֶם קֹדֶשׁ (lechem qodesh, "holy bread") shows him exercising the distinguishing half of that charge in real time.

Found via: Albert Barnes, Notes on the Bible (1834)
Reference Type: Echo
Connection Method(s): Analogy — Ahimelech's interrogation of David's men enacts the priestly charge of Leviticus 10:10-11: the narrative shows a priest doing precisely what the statute mandates, distinguishing holy bread from common use through applied Torah judgment in an unprecedented case