Some time later, the king of the Ammonites died and was succeeded by his son Hanun.
Significance
These are parallel accounts of the Ammonite-Aramean war that began when Hanun humiliated David's envoys. Both texts record that Hanun's princes counseled suspicion of David's חֶסֶד (chesed, "loyal kindness"), provoking the conflict. The Chronicler follows 2 Samuel closely but omits the broader Aramean campaign at Helam (2 Sam 10:15-19), compressing the narrative to focus on the initial dual-front battle under Joab and Abishai. This editorial choice reflects Chronicles' interest in David's military victories as establishing the security necessary for temple preparations rather than detailing the geopolitical aftermath.
Found via
Treasury of Scripture Knowledge
Reference Type
Allusion
Connection Method(s)
Redemptive-Historical Progression — the Ammonite-Aramean war is retold nearly verbatim but compressed (the Helam aftermath dropped), because in Chronicles the campaign functions as the securing of the kingdom on the eve of the temple preparations; the Samuel narrative is advanced into the Chronicler's temple-directed history.
Suggest a correction or idea
Spotted a broken link, a typo, a wrong reference — or have an idea that would help? Tell us. Keeping the web of Scripture accurate is a shared work.