Later text
Has a nation ever changed its gods, though they are no gods at all? Yet My people have exchanged their Glory for useless idols.
Intertextuality Pair
Allusion
Later text
Has a nation ever changed its gods, though they are no gods at all? Yet My people have exchanged their Glory for useless idols.
Earlier text
They sacrificed to demons, not to God, to gods they had not known, to newly arrived gods, which your fathers did not fear.
Both texts expose the absurdity of Israel exchanging the true God for non-gods. Deuteronomy 32:17 warns that Israel "sacrificed to demons, not to God, to gods they had not known" (לֹא אֱלֹהַּ, lo eloah), while Jeremiah 2:11 asks rhetorically whether any nation has ever changed its gods "though they are no gods at all" (וְהֵמָּה לֹא אֱלֹהִים, vehemmah lo elohim). Both employ the striking formulation of denying divine status to the objects of worship, using the negation of אֱלֹהִים (elohim). Jeremiah escalates the charge from Deuteronomy's historical narrative into a comparative argument: even pagan nations remain loyal to their false gods, yet Israel — uniquely — abandoned the living God for what has no power. The prophetic indictment transforms Moses's warning into a courtroom accusation against Judah. Jeremiah's own phrase for this exchange—"My people have exchanged their Glory for useless idols" (לְלֹא יוֹעִיל, lelo yo'il, "for what does not profit")—sharpens the charge that Israel traded the true God for the utterly useless.