← Home | ← Anchor Texts Index | Methodology: Anchor-Text Networks
"The LORD your God will raise up for you a prophet like me from among your brothers. You must listen to him. This is what you asked of the LORD your God at Horeb on the day of the assembly, when you said, "Let us not hear the voice of the LORD our God or see this great fire anymore, so that we will not die!" Then the LORD said to me, "They have spoken well. I will raise up for them a prophet like you from among their brothers. I will put My words in his mouth, and he will tell them everything I command him. And I will hold accountable anyone who does not listen to My words that the prophet speaks in My name."
— Deuteronomy 18:15-19 (Berean Standard Bible)
Setting. Moses's second discourse, given on the plains of Moab as Israel prepares to cross the Jordan. The immediate context is the regulation of prophecy (Deut 18:9-22) over against the divinatory practices of the nations Israel will dispossess. Moses contrasts Canaanite mediation — soothsayers, augurs, necromancers — with the legitimate Israelite mediation: a prophet like me. The promise looks backward to the Sinai assembly (Exod 20:18-21 / Deut 5:23-27), where the people, terrified by the theophanic voice and fire, begged for Moses to mediate; it looks forward to the unbroken line of mediation that the LORD will provide. The chapter closes with the criteria for distinguishing true from false prophets (vv. 20-22).
The verse functions as the OT's most concentrated forward-looking promise of a Mosaic mediator-figure: God will speak, but he will speak through a prophet; obedience to the prophet is obedience to God; refusing the prophet incurs divine sanction. The judgment clause of v. 19 — "whoever will not listen … I myself will require it of him" — is the verse's distinctive teeth.
Hebrew text fragments (the load-bearing clauses).
LXX rendering of the critical clause. The MT v. 15 ʾēlāyw tišmāʿûn ("to him you shall listen") becomes LXX αὐτοῦ ἀκούσεσθε — the precise verbal form that the Father's voice at the Transfiguration echoes: αὐτοῦ ἀκούετε (Mark 9:7 / Luke 9:35). The LXX verb and pronoun together supply the lexical bridge from Sinai's promise to the Mount-of-Transfiguration's confirmation.
Singular or successive? Second-Temple Judaism debated whether Moses's a prophet like me refers (a) to a succession of legitimate prophets serially filling the office over Israel's history, or (b) to a single eschatological prophet whose appearance climaxes the succession. The Qumran community, parts of Samaritan tradition, and the disciples in John 1:21 / 6:14 all read it as the latter — the prophet. The NT decisively confirms the eschatological-singular reading and identifies Jesus as the one Moses anticipated.
Three features explain why this Deuteronomic promise became, after Psalm 110, one of the most argumentatively load-bearing OT texts in apostolic preaching about Jesus's prophetic office:
1. The verse is textually self-conscious about its own future fulfillment. Most typological connections in the OT are recognized only retrospectively — the connection becomes visible from the NT vantage. Deut 18:15-19 is different: the text itself predicts its own fulfillment. "A prophet like me … to him you shall listen … I will put my words in his mouth … whoever will not listen … I myself will require it of him." Every clause has a prospective orientation. The text is a forward-looking type in the strict Schnittjer-Harmon sense — the type-text itself contains the indicators pointing forward, not merely the antitype-text reading back. This is what makes Deut 18 a textbook case for distinguishing forward-looking from backward-looking typology (see Five Essential Characteristics §4 — Pointing-Forwardness).
2. The judgment clause provides apostolic preaching with teeth. Most messianic OT texts promise blessing for those who receive the Coming One; Deut 18:19 specifies judgment for those who do not — "whoever will not listen … I myself will require it of him." The LXX sharpens this to exolothreuthēsetai (shall be utterly destroyed). Peter quotes precisely this clause at Acts 3:23, fusing it with Lev 23:29's kareth (cutting-off) penalty. The result is a unique apologetic weapon: rejection of Jesus is not merely unbelief but breach of the Mosaic covenant's own warning. No other OT messianic text supplies this exact rhetorical structure of receive-him-or-be-cut-off.
3. The promise is paradigmatically Mosaic, which makes Jesus the new lawgiver. The promise of a prophet like me — not like Samuel, not like Elijah, not like Isaiah — frames the eschatological figure specifically as a second Moses. This generates the broader Mosaic typology of the Gospels: Jesus on the mountain delivering the new law (Matt 5-7), Jesus feeding multitudes in the wilderness (Mark 6 / John 6 — where the crowd's response in John 6:14 explicitly invokes "the Prophet"), Jesus transfigured beside Moses himself on a mountain (Mark 9), Jesus as the mediator of a better covenant (Heb 3:1-6, 8:6). Deut 18:15-19 is the load-bearing OT text that authorizes the entire Moses/Jesus typological framework — without this verse, the Mosaic typology lacks an explicit OT warrant.
Deut 18:15-19's OT-internal life is concentrated in three movements: the Sinai backdrop that the verse explicitly invokes; the Jer 1:6-9 commission that mirrors v. 18; and the Deut 34:10 epitaph that closes the Torah by signaling the promise's continuing unfulfillment.
| # | OT Use | Anchor Connection | IP |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Exodus 20:19 (the people's request at Sinai) | The people, terrified by the theophany at Sinai, beg Moses: "You speak to us, and we will listen; but let not God speak to us, lest we die." Deut 18:15-19 is the divine response to that request — recapitulating it explicitly in v. 16. The Exodus 20 plea creates the structural slot; Deut 18 fills it with the promise of a perpetual Mosaic mediator culminating in the eschatological Prophet. The two texts together establish the necessity of mediated revelation in the post-Sinai economy. | Exod 20:19 → Deut 18:15-18 · Exod 20:19 → Deut 18:15 |
| 2 | Jeremiah 1:6-9 (Jeremiah's prophetic call) | OT-internal pivot: When the LORD commissions Jeremiah — "I have put my words in your mouth" (1:9) — the language is a near-verbatim reactivation of Deut 18:18 ("I will put my words in his mouth"). Jeremiah's call thus self-consciously locates him within the prophet-like-Moses tradition. But the form of the call — Jeremiah's reluctance, his "I am only a youth" — and the wider career — Jeremiah is one prophet whose words are rejected, not the eschatological singular — together signal that Jeremiah is a partial fulfillment, an instance of the succession, not its climax. The pairing demonstrates the canonical pattern: prophets serially occupy partial-Deut 18 roles, none completely, until the climactic Prophet arrives. | Deut 18:18 → Jer 1:6-9 · Deut 18:18 → Jer 1:6 · Jer 1:6 → Deut 18:18 · Jer 1:6-9 → Deut 18:18 |
| 3 | Deuteronomy 34:10 (the Torah's closing epitaph) | The final verses of the Torah declare: "And there has not arisen a prophet since in Israel like Moses, whom the LORD knew face to face." Read alongside Deut 18:15 — "a prophet like me" — the epitaph is deliberately framed: at the close of the Torah, the promised prophet-like-Moses has not yet appeared. The unfulfilled state of the Deut 18 promise is itself a canonical signal that the text is awaiting its eschatological referent. (No explicit IP yet — flagged in §10 below.) | (Allusive — no IP) |
The triangulation. The OT-internal network forms a deliberate canonical arc: Exodus 20:19 (the request that necessitates a mediator) → Deuteronomy 18:15-19 (the promise that perpetuates and climaxes the mediator-office) → Jeremiah 1:6-9 (the partial fulfillment in a covenant-era prophet whose words are rejected) → Deuteronomy 34:10 (the closing acknowledgment, written into the Torah itself, that no prophet like Moses has yet appeared). Each subsequent OT prophet (Isaiah, Ezekiel, Daniel, the Twelve) takes on portions of the Mosaic mediator-role, but none meets all three Deut 18 criteria simultaneously — a prophet like Moses + whose words must be heeded + whose rejection brings divine sanction. The thinness of the OT-internal trail past Jeremiah is itself the signal: the verse is canonically loaded but awaits a unique referent.
The NT cites or alludes to Deut 18:15-19 in at least 9 distinct passages, distributed across the Johannine literature, the Lukan corpus, the Synoptic Transfiguration, and the early Jerusalem sermons in Acts. The two explicit citations (Acts 3:22-23 and Acts 7:37) are the load-bearing pillars; the Transfiguration's αὐτοῦ ἀκούετε is the most theologically dense allusion; the Johannine engagements track the question of the eschatological Prophet across the Fourth Gospel. Mapped by section:
John's Gospel runs a sustained subplot about the identification of the eschatological Prophet. The question is raised at the beginning (1:21), partially answered by an apostle (1:45), confirmed by the crowd after the loaves (6:14), and given its theological substance by Jesus himself (12:49).
| Passage | Anchor Verse | Use | IP |
|---|---|---|---|
| John 1:21 | Deut 18:15 (allusion) | The priests and Levites interrogate John the Baptist: "Are you the Prophet?" John denies it — "No." The question itself presupposes that the audience expects the Prophet; the article in "the Prophet" reflects the eschatological-singular reading of Deut 18:15 current in first-century Judaism. John's denial preserves the expectation for the one who comes after him. | John 1:21 → Deut 18:15 |
| John 1:45 | Deut 18:15 | Philip to Nathanael: "We have found him of whom Moses in the Law … wrote — Jesus of Nazareth, the son of Joseph." The Mosaic prediction Philip has in view is most plausibly Deut 18:15-19 — the one OT passage where Moses explicitly wrote about the coming Prophet. The verse supplies the framing for the disciple-recognition. | John 1:45 → Deut 18:15 |
| John 6:14 | Deut 18:15 | After Jesus feeds the five thousand — paradigmatically Mosaic provision of bread in the wilderness — the crowd responds: "This is indeed the Prophet who is to come into the world!" The wilderness-feeding sign triggers the Deut 18:15 identification. The crowd reads the typology correctly but, as the chapter develops (vv. 26-66), fails to receive the Prophet's words (the more demanding implication of to him you shall listen). | John 6:14 → Deut 18:15 |
| John 12:49 | Deut 18:18-19 | Jesus discloses the structure of his own ministry in language that exactly fits Deut 18:18's commission of the Mosaic Prophet: "I have not spoken on my own authority, but the Father who sent me has himself given me a commandment — what to say and what to speak." The Father-puts-words-in-my-mouth dynamic of Deut 18:18 is internalized as Jesus's self-description; the v. 19 judgment clause is then echoed at John 12:48 — "the word that I have spoken will judge him on the last day." John 12:48-49 is, in effect, Jesus's own commentary on Deut 18:18-19. | John 12:49 → Deut 18:18-19 |
The most theologically dense NT engagement with Deut 18:15 is not an explicit citation but the divine voice from the cloud at the Transfiguration. The Father quotes Moses to authorize the Son.
| Passage | Anchor Verse | Use | IP |
|---|---|---|---|
| Luke 9:35 | Deut 18:15 | CRITICAL: The divine voice at the Transfiguration declares: "This is my Son, my Chosen One; listen to him" (αὐτοῦ ἀκούετε). The verbal echo of LXX Deut 18:15 (αὐτοῦ ἀκούσεσθε) is unmistakable. The Father, in the presence of Moses himself (vv. 30-31), commands the disciples to listen to Jesus in the very words by which Moses commanded Israel to listen to the coming Prophet. The Father therefore cites Moses to authorize the Son. This is a categorical Christological claim: Jesus is the Mosaic eschatological Prophet, and his words must be heeded on Moses's own authority. | Luke 9:35 → Deut 18:15 |
Acts contains the two explicit verbatim citations of Deut 18:15-19 in the NT, both in early Jerusalem sermons, both load-bearing in their respective arguments.
| Passage | Anchor Verse | Use | IP |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acts 3:22-23 | Deut 18:15, 18:15-20 | CRITICAL: Peter's Solomon's-Portico sermon after the healing of the lame man. Peter explicitly cites Deut 18:15-19 — "Moses said, 'The Lord God will raise up for you a prophet like me from your brothers. You shall listen to him in whatever he tells you. And it shall be that every soul who does not listen to that prophet shall be destroyed from the people.'" This is the first apostolic explicit identification of Jesus as the Deut 18 Prophet, and it deploys the v. 19 judgment clause (sharpened with Lev 23:29's kareth language — exolothreuthēsetai) as the warrant for the imperative of repentance and faith. Peter is preaching law-and-gospel from the Mosaic warning text itself. | Acts 3:22 → Deut 18:15 · Acts 3:22-23 → Deut 18:15-20 |
| Acts 7:37 | Deut 18:15 | CRITICAL: Stephen's defense speech before the Sanhedrin. Recounting Moses's career, Stephen quotes Deut 18:15 — "This is the Moses who said to the Israelites, 'God will raise up for you a prophet like me from your brothers.'" In the larger argument of Stephen's speech, Israel has always rejected its prophets (vv. 35-43, 51-53), and the Deut 18 prophet is the climactic case: Jesus is the rejected Prophet to whom Israel has done what Israel always does. The citation occupies the structural midpoint of the speech (between the Moses-narrative and the temple-critique) and anchors the indictment that follows. | Acts 7:37 → Deut 18:15 |
| Passage | Anchor Verse | Use | IP |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 John 3:23 | Deut 18:15-19 (allusion) | "And this is his commandment, that we believe in the name of his Son Jesus Christ." The reading of "the commandment" (singular) as faith-in-the-Son echoes Deut 18:19's whoever will not listen … I myself will require it of him. The Johannine community reads belief-in-the-Son as the obligation Deut 18:19 imposed in advance. | 1 John 3:23 → Deut 18:15-19 |
Four observations across the full Deut 18:15-19 network:
1. The two explicit citations are both early-Jerusalem and both kerygmatic. Acts 3:22-23 (Peter) and Acts 7:37 (Stephen) — the only verbatim NT citations — are both delivered in Jerusalem, to Jewish audiences, within the first apostolic decade, in sermons whose argumentative weight rests on Mosaic authority. The pattern reveals where Deut 18 belongs in apostolic preaching: it is the OT text deployed when arguing to Israel that Jesus is the legitimate Mosaic successor whom Moses himself anticipated. The text disappears from later Pauline letters to Gentile audiences, where the relevant warrants are Abrahamic (Gen 15:6) and royal (Ps 2; Ps 110). Deut 18 is the Mosaic-covenant-internal warrant for identifying Jesus, and its NT distribution reflects that.
2. The Johannine subplot tracks the question across the Gospel. John 1:21 raises the question (Is John the Prophet? — No); John 1:45 frames the disciple-recognition (Moses wrote about him); John 6:14 has the crowd attempt the identification (this is the Prophet); John 12:49 has Jesus internalize the Deut 18:18 commission as his own self-description. The Fourth Evangelist is plotting the Deut 18 question through his narrative — a subplot that runs alongside the more visible "I am" Christology. The reader who knows Deut 18 reads John's Gospel as a sustained argument that Jesus is the Mosaic Prophet at every stage of his ministry.
3. The Transfiguration is the network's prosopological climax. The Father's αὐτοῦ ἀκούετε (Mark 9:7 / Luke 9:35) is not the most explicit NT citation of Deut 18:15 — Acts 3:22 is more verbatim — but it is the most theologically dense. The Father himself cites Moses (in the presence of Moses) to authorize the Son. The speech chain is Father → (citing Moses) → about the Son, addressed to the disciples. This is a prosopological reading in the strict sense (see Prosopological Readings Index): a specific speaker (the Father) cites a specific OT speaker (Moses) to identify a specific divine auditor-of-obedience (the Son) for a specific human audience (the disciples). No other NT engagement with Deut 18:15 carries this density.
4. The judgment clause (v. 19) is the apostolic apologetic edge. Most NT citations of OT messianic texts deploy the promise dimension. Acts 3:23's citation is unusual in deploying the threat dimension — and sharpening it with the Lev 23:29 kareth language. The pattern reveals an apostolic strategy: when Deut 18 is being argued to Israel, the v. 19 judgment clause supplies the warrant for urgent repentance. Rejection of Jesus is not merely an error of judgment but breach of the Mosaic covenant's own warning. The fusion of Deut 18:19 with Lev 23:29 in Acts 3:23 is one of the NT's most pointed law-and-gospel deployments of an OT text.
Deut 18:15-19 carries distinctive weight in apostolic Christology because it is the OT's most explicit forward-looking promise about prophetic mediation. Four implications:
For Christology — the prophetic office. Reformed Christology has classically structured Christ's mediatorial work under three offices: prophet, priest, and king. The prophetic office is anchored canonically here. Jesus is the Mosaic eschatological Prophet because Deut 18:15-19 predicts him, the Transfiguration's divine voice identifies him, and the apostles preach him under this category. Without Deut 18:15-19, the prophetic office in Reformed Christology has no concentrated OT-textual warrant — only the diffuse evidence of Jesus's teaching ministry. With Deut 18:15-19, the prophetic office is grounded in a specific Mosaic promise whose fulfillment Christ explicitly claims (John 12:49) and whose authorization the Father explicitly grants (Luke 9:35).
For the doctrine of revelation. Deut 18:15-19 establishes that authoritative divine revelation in the post-Sinai economy is mediated through a prophet whose words are God's words. The promise of "I will put my words in his mouth" (v. 18) is the OT's most direct anticipation of the NT's claim that Jesus's words are the Father's words (John 12:49; cf. John 7:16; 14:24). The continuity is unbroken: Sinai mediation → succession of canonical prophets → Mosaic eschatological Prophet → the words of Jesus. The apostolic preaching of "what we heard from him" (1 John 1:1-3) inherits the Deut 18 framework: to hear the apostles is to hear Christ; to hear Christ is to hear the Father. The verse therefore underwrites the entire structure of NT Christological revelation.
For the doctrine of judgment. The v. 19 judgment clause — and Peter's deployment of it at Acts 3:23 — establishes that rejection of the eschatological Prophet is not religious neutrality but covenant-breach with named sanction. This is theologically critical. The NT does not present unbelief as mere intellectual error or cultural preference; it presents unbelief as the specific offense Deut 18:19 warned against in advance. The doctrine that Christ-rejection brings judgment is grounded not only in NT pronouncements (e.g., John 3:18, 36) but in the OT's own forward-looking warning. The apostolic confidence in preaching judgment to unbelievers rests partly on the conviction that Moses himself anticipated this very scenario.
For typology — the textbook forward-looking case. Deut 18:15-19 is the cleanest canonical example of a forward-looking type in the strict Schnittjer-Harmon sense: the OT text itself contains the indicators of its prospective orientation. This distinguishes it from backward-looking types like Adam (whose typological function emerges only retrospectively in Romans 5) or Melchizedek (whose typological function emerges only retrospectively in Hebrews 7). Deut 18 predicts the prediction. The text-self-conscious nature of the promise makes it pedagogically valuable: when teaching the difference between forward-looking and backward-looking typology, Deut 18:15-19 paired with Adam or Melchizedek is the canonical contrast pair. (See Five Essential Characteristics §4 — Pointing-Forwardness.)
Primary overlap: TT 104 - Moses (The Prophet Like Unto Me) — the Mosaic trajectory treating Moses across the canonical roles of lawgiver, deliverer, intercessor, mediator, and prophet, with Deut 18:15-19 as its hinge text.
The complementarity. A Trajectory Table on Moses as type of Christ treats the figure of Moses across multiple dimensions — Moses as deliverer (typifying Christ's exodus-deliverance), Moses as lawgiver (typifying Christ's new-covenant law), Moses as intercessor (typifying Christ's high-priestly intercession), Moses as mediator (typifying Christ's Heb 8 mediation), and Moses as prophet (typifying Christ's Deut 18 prophetic office). The TT's analytical unit is Moses-the-figure; its task is to trace the multi-dimensional typology across the canon and show how Christ fulfills each dimension.
This ATN, by contrast, treats Deut 18:15-19 as a text. Its analytical unit is not Moses but the specific verbal promise of vv. 15-19, with its specific judgment clause in v. 19 and the specific LXX rendering αὐτοῦ ἀκούσεσθε that the Transfiguration cites. A preacher working a Christology sermon on the prophetic office wants both: the TT for the multi-dimensional Mosaic typology, this ATN for the specific text's NT citation map and for the Transfiguration's direct prosopological quotation of Moses by the Father.
The two genres do not compete; they intersect at the prophet-dimension of the broader Mosaic typology. The TT handles the office; the ATN handles the promise-text.
Other anchor texts in the same theological orbit:
The three most theologically weighty uses in the network, flagged for sermon prep / scholarly attention:
| # | Citation | Why Critical |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Luke 9:35 (with Mark 9:7) — the Transfiguration | The divine voice itself cites Deut 18:15 (αὐτοῦ ἀκούετε echoing LXX αὐτοῦ ἀκούσεσθε) to identify Jesus as the Mosaic eschatological Prophet. The prosopological grammar is unique: the Father, in the presence of Moses himself, quotes Moses to authorize the Son. The Christological claim is categorical — Jesus is the one Moses anticipated, on Moses's own warrant. No other NT engagement with Deut 18 carries this density. |
| 2 | Acts 3:22-23 — Peter's Solomon's-Portico sermon | The first apostolic explicit citation of Deut 18:15-19, deployed with the v. 19 judgment clause (sharpened to exolothreuthēsetai via fusion with Lev 23:29's kareth). Peter preaches law-and-gospel from the Mosaic warning text itself: those who will not listen will be cut off. The single most pointed apostolic deployment of an OT threat text. |
| 3 | Acts 7:37 — Stephen's Sanhedrin defense | The second apostolic explicit citation, occupying the structural midpoint of Stephen's speech. In the larger argument that Israel has always rejected its prophets, the Deut 18 Prophet is the climactic case — Jesus is the rejected Prophet to whom Israel has done what Israel always does. The citation transforms the Sanhedrin trial of Stephen into Israel's trial of itself under the Deut 18:19 judgment clause. |
The following IPs would strengthen this network if added:
| Connection | Status |
|---|---|
| Deuteronomy 34:10 → Deuteronomy 18:15 (the Torah's closing epitaph that no prophet like Moses has yet arisen, signaling the Deut 18 promise's continuing canonical unfulfillment) | High priority — would close the OT-internal arc by formalizing the canonical-signal observation in §3 |
| Acts 3:23 → Leviticus 23:29 (the kareth / exolothreuthēsetai fusion that sharpens the Deut 18:19 judgment clause) | High priority — the fused citation is structurally essential to Acts 3:22-23's law-and-gospel argument |
| John 12:48 → Deuteronomy 18:19 (Jesus's "the word that I have spoken will judge him on the last day" as the Johannine internalization of the Deut 18:19 judgment clause) | Medium priority — complements the existing John 12:49 → Deut 18:18-19 IP by capturing the v. 48 judgment-side echo |
| John 7:16 → Deuteronomy 18:18 ("My teaching is not mine, but his who sent me" as further Johannine reuse of the Deut 18:18 commissioning frame) | Medium priority — extends the Johannine subplot beyond the four currently IP'd nodes |
| Hebrews 3:1-6 → Deuteronomy 18:15-19 (Jesus as the apostle and high priest of our confession, faithful over God's house as a son, surpassing Moses as a servant) | Medium priority — Hebrews 3 is the NT's most sustained Moses/Christ comparison and presupposes Deut 18 as the canonical-frame for the comparison |
| Source | Contribution |
|---|---|
| G.K. Beale & D.A. Carson (eds.), Commentary on the New Testament Use of the Old Testament (Baker, 2007) | Verse-by-verse documentation of NT citations of Deut 18:15-19 across Acts, the Johannine literature, and the Transfiguration accounts |
| Gary E. Schnittjer & Matthew S. Harmon, How to Study the Bible's Use of the Bible (Zondervan Academic, 2024) | Forward-looking vs. backward-looking typology; Deut 18:15-19 as the textbook forward-looking case |
| Daniel I. Block, Deuteronomy (NIVAC; Zondervan, 2012), on Deut 18:9-22 | The Sinai backdrop and the singular-vs-successive interpretive question in Second Temple Judaism |
| Peter T. O'Brien, The Letter to the Hebrews (Pillar; Eerdmans, 2010), on Heb 3:1-6 | The Hebrews engagement with Moses/Christ typology and its presupposition of Deut 18 |
| Eckhard J. Schnabel, Acts (ZECNT; Zondervan, 2012), on Acts 3:22-23 and Acts 7:37 | The two explicit apostolic citations; the Lev 23:29 / Deut 18:19 fusion at Acts 3:23 |
| Richard Bauckham, Jesus and the God of Israel (Eerdmans, 2008) | The Transfiguration's divine-voice citation and its prosopological structure |
| Andreas J. Köstenberger, A Theology of John's Gospel and Letters (Zondervan, 2009) | The Johannine subplot of the Prophet question across John 1, 6, 7, and 12 |
| Patrick Fairbairn, The Typology of Scripture, Vol. 1 | Moses as type of Christ across multiple dimensions, with the prophetic dimension grounded in Deut 18 |
| Edmund P. Clowney, The Unfolding Mystery (P&R, 1988) | The prophetic office of Christ and its canonical grounding in Deut 18:15-19 |
| Geerhardus Vos, Biblical Theology (Eerdmans, 1948) | The Mosaic mediator-office and its eschatological climax in Christ |
← Home | ← Anchor Texts Index | Methodology: Anchor-Text Networks