← Home | ← Anchor Texts Index | Methodology: Anchor-Text Networks
"Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God, the LORD is One." (v.4)
"And you shall love the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength." (v.5)
— Deuteronomy 6:4-5 (Berean Standard Bible)
Setting. Moses's second-generation Sinai exposition on the plains of Moab, on the eve of Israel's entry into Canaan. Deuteronomy 6 stands at the head of the law's parenetic exposition — having recited the Decalogue in chapter 5, Moses now opens the body of covenant instruction with a single confession (v. 4) and a single command (v. 5) on which the whole of the covenant is to hang. The Shema is positioned as the lens through which the entire covenant is to be read — and the surrounding verses (6:6-9) make it the text that is to be bound on the hand, written on the doorposts, and recited from morning to evening. It is the OT's only text commanded to be recited daily.
Hebrew text fragments (the load-bearing clauses).
LXX form. ἄκουε Ισραηλ κύριος ὁ θεὸς ἡμῶν κύριος εἷς ἐστιν· καὶ ἀγαπήσεις κύριον τὸν θεόν σου ἐξ ὅλης τῆς καρδίας σου καὶ ἐξ ὅλης τῆς ψυχῆς σου καὶ ἐξ ὅλης τῆς δυνάμεώς σου. The LXX renders məʾōd with dynamis ("power, strength"); some manuscripts add dianoia ("understanding, mind") — anticipating the NT's fourfold expansion.
Four features explain why the Shema became the OT's single most generative confession, the text Jewish piety memorized first and Christian apostolic preaching never displaced:
1. It is a confession and a command in one breath. Almost no other OT text fuses creedal declaration ("Yahweh is one") with imperative response ("you shall love") in a single utterance. Other OT confessions describe God; other OT commands prescribe conduct. The Shema does both at once, in a sequence that makes the command depend on the confession. Because Yahweh is one, therefore love him with all. The internal logic is what later authors — pre-eminently Jesus — will exploit when they declare this commandment "the greatest."
2. The form was already liturgical. By the Second Temple period (and likely earlier), the Shema was recited twice daily, bound on phylacteries, and fixed to doorposts (the mezuzah). The text was thus the most-rehearsed verbal form in Israelite religious life. When Jesus, Paul, John, or the Acts narrator picks up Shema language, they are not summoning an obscure passage — they are activating the very confession every Jewish hearer had recited that morning. The verbal economy of NT Shema-allusion is therefore extreme: a few words evoke the whole.
3. Tensions inside the text — the one-ness of God. The single word ʾeḥād holds together two truths that later canonical history will press in different directions. In its OT-Sinai context, ʾeḥād is primarily polemical against polytheism — there is one God, not many. But the same word is also used in Genesis 2:24 ("the two shall become one flesh"), where ʾeḥād designates a composite unity. The NT's most consequential exegetical move — Paul's split of the Shema in 1 Corinthians 8:6 — exploits the semantic range of ʾeḥād to include the Lord Jesus within the divine identity without abandoning the confession of monotheism. The text is theologically productive because the polemical and composite-unity readings are both linguistically available within the same word.
4. It is structurally load-bearing in NT argumentation. Jesus identifies the Shema as the greatest commandment (Mark 12:29-31; Matt 22:37-39). Paul rewrites it Christologically (1 Cor 8:6). John presupposes it in defining eternal life (John 17:3). Acts narrates the apostolic community as a Shema-shaped people ("one heart and one soul," Acts 4:32). The Shema is not one OT text among many in NT theology — it is the monotheistic substrate that the apostles must explain Christ in relation to.
The Shema's OT-internal reuse is now captured by formal IPs (six created 2026-06-19; only the Jeremiah 32:39-41 row remains open) — and the canonical career of Deut 6:4-5 within the OT is real and runs through the covenant-renewal liturgy of the Deuteronomistic History and the prophets. The Shema's verbal form ("love Yahweh with all your heart and all your soul") becomes the template for covenant fidelity language across the OT. The chronological development:
| # | OT Use | Citation Form | Purpose | IP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Deuteronomy 10:12; 11:1, 13, 22; 13:3; 30:6, 16, 20 | Moses himself reuses Shema language across the rest of Deuteronomy as the summary of covenant demand — most strikingly Deut 30:6, where Yahweh promises to "circumcise your heart… to love the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul" | Shema-language as the canonical shorthand for covenant fidelity within Deuteronomy itself; Deut 30:6 already anticipates the new-covenant interiorization | IP (Deut 30:6) |
| 2 | Joshua 22:5 | Joshua's commission to the trans-Jordanian tribes: "take careful heed… to love the LORD your God, to walk in all his ways, to keep his commandments… and to serve him with all your heart and with all your soul" — explicit Shema citation in covenant-renewal speech | Shema as the conquest-generation's covenant test | IP |
| 3 | 1 Kings 8:48 | Solomon's temple-dedication prayer envisions exilic repentance: "if they return to you with all their heart and with all their soul" — Shema language transposed to a future restoration scenario | Shema-language carried into temple liturgy and exilic theology | IP |
| 4 | 2 Kings 23:25 | The narrator's epitaph for Josiah: "Before him there was no king like him, who turned to the LORD with all his heart and with all his soul and with all his might, according to all the Law of Moses" — the only OT figure explicitly credited with fulfilling the Shema's three-fold demand | The Shema as the measuring rod of kingly faithfulness; Josiah as the canonical exemplar | IP |
| 5 | Jeremiah 4:4 | "Circumcise yourselves to the LORD; remove the foreskin of your hearts" — Jeremiah picks up the heart-language of Deut 30:6 (which itself reuses Deut 6:5) | Prophetic interiorization of the Shema in the call to repentance | IP |
| 6 | Jeremiah 32:39-41 | New-covenant promise: "I will give them one heart and one way" — explicit reuse of the Shema's ʾeḥād paired with the heart-language of Deut 6:5 | Shema-language deployed in the new-covenant oracle | (no IP yet — see §10) |
| 7 | Zechariah 14:9 | "And the LORD will be king over all the earth. On that day the LORD will be one and his name one" — the only OT text outside the Shema itself to use YHWH ʾeḥād | Eschatological universalization of the Shema's monotheistic confession | IP |
The former thinness of formal IP coverage was itself diagnostic. The Shema is so liturgically saturated in OT covenant language that its allusions had rarely been flagged as discrete IPs — every Deuteronomistic "with all your heart and with all your soul" formula echoes it, and the vault's IP corpus had not been built out to capture this pervasive influence. Six of these seven connections now have IP files (created 2026-06-19); only Jeremiah 32:39-41 (row 6) remains an open candidate in the Gap List (§10).
Two observations on the OT-to-OT pattern. (1) The Shema's ʾeḥād clause receives almost no OT echo outside Zechariah 14:9 — the monotheistic confession sits dormant in the canon until the NT mobilizes it Christologically. (2) The Shema's love-with-all clause, by contrast, is the most-echoed sub-formula of any OT text, becoming the verbal template for covenant fidelity from Joshua through Jeremiah. The two halves of the Shema thus have markedly different OT canonical careers — the confession waits; the command propagates.
The NT does not merely cite the Shema; it integrates Christ into the Shema's confession. Each of the five existing NT-to-OT IPs participates in this integration from a distinct angle.
Per the ATN methodology (§5), each entry carries the Text Form (the citation's Vorlage — MT / LXX / composite) and the Operation (the interpretive move, cross-referencing Beale's twelve primary uses of the OT in the NT).
| # | NT Use | Anchor Verse(s) | Text Form | Operation (Beale) | Use | IP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Matthew 22:37-39 | Deut 6:5 | LXX-based, threefold — ἐν ὅλῃ τῇ καρδίᾳ… ψυχῇ… διανοίᾳ: dianoia ("mind") replaces the LXX's dynamis ("strength"), drawing on the LXX's variant tradition; ἐν + dative for the LXX's ἐξ + genitive | Abiding authority — the love-command cited as the permanently binding "great and first commandment" | CRITICAL: Jesus, asked for the greatest commandment, cites Deut 6:5 and pairs it with Lev 19:18 — declaring the Shema's love-command "the great and first commandment," then adding the canon-hermeneutical claim unique to Matthew: "On these two commandments depend all the Law and the Prophets" (22:40). The Shema becomes the hermeneutical hinge of the whole canon. | Matt 22:37-39 → Deut 6:5 |
| 2 | Mark 12:29-31 | Deut 6:4-5 | LXX Deut 6:4 verbatim (ἄκουε Ἰσραήλ, κύριος ὁ θεὸς ἡμῶν κύριος εἷς ἐστιν); v. 5 in fourfold form — adds dianoia ("mind") to heart/soul and renders məʾōd with ἰσχύς (LXX: δύναμις) | Abiding authority — the Shema cited whole (confession + command) as "the first commandment of all" | CRITICAL: Jesus, asked the same question, uniquely includes the monotheistic confession of v. 4 ("Hear, O Israel: the Lord our God, the Lord is one") together with the love command of v. 5. Matthew and Luke truncate to v. 5 alone. Mark's preservation of v. 4 is theologically loaded: Jesus identifies the foundation of love-of-God in the confession that God is one. | Mark 12:29-31 → Deut 6:4-5 |
| 3 | John 13:34-35 | Deut 6:5 | Allusion — no citation formula; built on the Shema's LXX verb ἀγαπήσεις (ἀγαπάω) | Analogical use — the Shema's love-command rewritten with Christ's self-giving as its new measure | The "new commandment" — "love one another as I have loved you" — is built on the Shema's verb (ἀγαπάω) and structurally rewrites it: the command to love God with all is now extended into the command to love brothers with the love Christ has shown. The new commandment is the Shema reorganized around Christ's self-giving as its measure. | Jn 13:34-35 → Deut 6:5 |
| 4 | John 17:3 | Deut 6:4 | Allusion — μόνος ἀληθινὸς θεός paraphrases the LXX's κύριος εἷς; no citation formula | Abiding authority, Christologically redefined — the one-God confession restated with Jesus Christ included in its relational economy | CRITICAL: "This is eternal life, that they know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom you have sent." Eternal life is redefined as knowledge of the one true God — the Shema's ʾeḥād rendered as μόνος ἀληθινός θεός — paired with knowledge of Jesus Christ. The Shema is not violated; it is restated with Christ explicitly included within the relational economy of the one God. | Jn 17:3 → Deut 6:4 |
| 5 | Acts 4:32 | Deut 6:5 | Echo — the καρδία/ψυχή pair ("one heart and soul"); no citation formula | Assimilated use — Shema language absorbed into the narrative description of the Spirit-shaped community | "The full number of those who believed were of one heart and soul" — the apostolic community is described in Shema language reapplied corporately. The "all your heart and all your soul" demand on the individual Israelite becomes the descriptive reality of the Spirit-shaped community. | Acts 4:32 → Deut 6:5 |
| # | NT Use | Anchor Verse(s) | Text Form | Operation (Beale) | Use | IP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 1 Corinthians 8:6 | Deut 6:4 | Reworked LXX — Paul splits LXX Deut 6:4's κύριος… θεός… εἷς, distributing θεός to the Father and κύριος to Jesus Christ while preserving εἷς for each | Abiding authority, Christologically reconfigured — the Shema reaffirmed as the church's confession with Christ included within the divine identity (Bauckham's "Christological monotheism") | CRITICAL: "For us there is one God, the Father, from whom are all things and for whom we exist, and one Lord, Jesus Christ, through whom are all things and through whom we exist." Paul splits the Shema's single divine name, distributing θεός ("God") to the Father and κύριος ("Lord," the LXX rendering of YHWH) to Jesus Christ — yet without breaking the Shema's εἷς ("one"). Bauckham calls this "the earliest and most consequential Christological reformulation of the Shema in the NT." | 1 Cor 8:6 → Deut 6:4 |
This is the most theologically consequential NT use of the Shema (an IP now exists — see the row above). The argument bears spelling out: Paul does not abandon Jewish monotheism; he reorganizes it. He takes the LXX's κύριος εἷς ἐστιν ("the Lord is one") and renders κύριος as a name for Jesus, while preserving the predicate εἷς. The result is a confession that is recognizably the Shema, structurally — one God, one Lord — but whose terms now include Christ. This is the textual signature of what Bauckham terms "Christological monotheism."
Five observations across the full Shema network:
1. Verse 4 and verse 5 have different canonical lives. Verse 4 (the monotheistic confession) is reused almost nowhere in the OT, then is picked up explosively in the NT for Christological monotheism — Mark 12:29, John 17:3, 1 Cor 8:6, and arguably James 2:19 ("you believe that God is one") and Ephesians 4:5-6. Verse 5 (the love command) propagates broadly across the OT covenant-fidelity tradition (Joshua, 1-2 Kings, Jeremiah) and is picked up by Jesus as the greatest commandment in the Synoptic tradition. The two halves of the Shema function as two distinct anchors.
2. The NT reuses the Shema with Christ included, never with Christ replacing. This is the single most important pattern across the network. Mark 12:29 cites the monotheistic confession in full and then identifies the love-command (now extended to Christ as Lord) as its corollary. 1 Corinthians 8:6 splits the Shema but preserves the εἷς ("one"). John 17:3 names "the only true God" alongside "Jesus Christ whom you have sent" without retracting μόνος. The apostolic pattern is to expand the Shema's referential field, not to amend its confessional core. Bauckham calls this "the inclusion of Jesus within the unique divine identity of the one God."
3. The Shema is the substrate for the NT's binding-of-believers commands. Jesus's "love your neighbor as yourself" (Matt 22:39, Mark 12:31) is paired with the Shema; John's "love one another as I have loved you" rewrites it (Jn 13:34); Acts 4:32 describes the community as embodying it ("one heart and one soul"); Paul's "love is the fulfilling of the law" (Rom 13:10) presupposes it. The Shema is the textual root of NT love-ethics.
4. The fourfold expansion is theologically deliberate. Where Deut 6:5 names heart, soul, and might (three), Mark 12:30 adds dianoia ("mind") to yield four (heart, soul, mind, strength). The LXX's variant tradition (some manuscripts include dianoia) provides cover, but the NT consistently presses to four — likely to signal that the love-command engages the whole of the cognitive/affective/volitional/physical person without remainder. The expansion is not contraction-elsewhere; it is totalizing emphasis.
5. The Shema is the OT's monotheistic substrate that the NT must explain Christ in relation to — and does, by including Christ within it. This is the load-bearing pattern. The NT does not present Christ as a second God, threatening monotheism; nor does it relegate Christ to a status below God, denying his divine identity. Instead, the apostolic move is to read the Shema's ʾeḥād as having room for the Father and the Son (and eventually the Spirit) without ceasing to be ʾeḥād. The textual mechanism for this move is the splitting of YHWH (rendered κύριος in LXX) and Elohim (rendered θεός in LXX): the NT distributes these two divine names between Father and Son while keeping the εἷς. This is the technical exegetical foundation of NT Trinitarianism.
The Shema carries more weight for the NT's doctrine of God than any other OT confession. Three implications:
For the doctrine of God. The Shema is the OT text that establishes the unicity of God against the polytheism of the ANE. The NT's most consequential theological achievement — the inclusion of Jesus Christ within the divine identity — does not bypass this confession. It is constituted through this confession. Paul does not say "the Shema has been superseded"; he says "the Shema, properly read, names the Father and the Son." This is the textual root of Christian Trinitarianism, and any account of the doctrine of God that fails to begin here begins in the wrong place.
For Christology. Jesus's place in the Shema is not a late addition to NT theology; it is the earliest. 1 Corinthians is among Paul's earliest letters (mid-50s AD), and 1 Cor 8:6 already deploys the Christological-Shema move. The argument that "high Christology" developed slowly cannot survive the textual evidence. Within twenty-five years of the resurrection, Paul is rewriting the Shema to include Jesus as κύριος. As Hurtado argues, this is devotional and confessional fact, not theological speculation.
For ethics. The greatest commandment, as Jesus identifies it, is the Shema's love-command. The NT does not generate a new ethical center; it retrieves and intensifies the Shema's center. The implication for Christian formation is that the doctrine of God and the demand of love are not two topics but one: because God is one, therefore love him with all — and (Jesus's expansion) love your neighbor with the same love. The Shema makes monotheism and love ethically inseparable.
For ecclesiology. Acts 4:32's "one heart and one soul" is not metaphor; it is a Shema-application to the church. The community that has heard the Shema and loved God with all has become, through the Spirit, a community whose interior unity reflects the Shema's confession of God's unity. The church's unity is theologically downstream of God's unity. Where the church is divided, it has failed the Shema.
TT 046 — Divine Identity (Deity of Christ)
This Trajectory Table treats the deity of Christ as a subject — the NT's systematic inclusion of Jesus within the unique divine identity of the God of Israel, developed across redemptive-historical stages from the divine name (Exod 3:14) through the Shema (its Stage 2, "OT Foundation — Monotheistic Core"), the throne visions (Isa 6), Ps 110:1, Dan 7:13-14, and Zech 12:10 to the NT's "I AM" claims, the Christ-hymns, and the Alpha-and-Omega consummation. The unit of analysis is the doctrine.
This ATN treats the text of Deut 6:4-5 — which verses got picked up where, by which author, in what text-form, for what argument. Deut 6:4 is one stop in TT 046's trajectory; here it is the gravitational center. The ATN also covers the entire love-command career of v. 5 (the Deuteronomistic covenant-fidelity chain, Matt 22:37-39, Mark 12:29-31, John 13:34-35, Acts 4:32), which lies outside TT 046's divine-identity scope. Both files treat John 17:3 and 1 Cor 8:6 from complementary angles: the TT for what they prove about Christ's identity, the ATN for what they do with the Shema's wording.
No Trajectory Table yet exists for "the Greatest Commandment / Love of God" or "the New Covenant Heart." Two candidate TTs that this ATN's network would support if commissioned:
This is an example of how building ATNs surfaces gaps in TT coverage — see Methodology §9c — Gap-discovery feedback. (A third candidate originally proposed here — "Christological Monotheism / The Inclusion of Jesus in the Divine Identity" — already exists as TT 046 above.)
Other anchor texts in the same theological orbit:
The four most theologically weighty uses in the network, flagged for sermon prep / scholarly attention:
| # | Citation | Why Critical |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mark 12:29-31 | The NT's only quotation of the Shema's monotheistic confession (v. 4) by Jesus himself. Matthew and Luke truncate to v. 5; Mark uniquely preserves Jesus's recitation of both halves — the confession ("the Lord is one") and the command ("you shall love"). The Markan inclusion sets the pattern: Jesus does not bypass the Shema's monotheism; he confesses it and then identifies the love-command as its corollary. This is the hermeneutical bridge from Jewish Shema-piety to Christian Christological monotheism. |
| 2 | John 17:3 | Eternal life is redefined as knowledge of "the only true God" (μόνος ἀληθινός θεός — a paraphrase of the Shema's ʾeḥād) and Jesus Christ whom you have sent. The Shema's μόνος is preserved; Jesus is named alongside the only true God without violating the μόνος. The high-priestly prayer thus locates eternal life inside the Shema-with-Jesus framework. The Johannine Christology's claim to eternity and divinity is built on this textual move. |
| 3 | 1 Corinthians 8:6 | The single most consequential NT integration of the Shema. Paul splits the Shema's divine name, distributing θεός to the Father and κύριος (LXX = YHWH) to Jesus Christ, while preserving εἷς. This is the earliest datable Christological reformulation of the Shema (Paul writing mid-50s AD) and the textual substrate for Pauline Christology, ecclesiology, and the doctrine of God. Bauckham, Hurtado, and Wright all identify this verse as the central NT-Christology text. IP created 2026-06-19 — the network's former most-critical gap, now filled. |
| 4 | Matthew 22:37-39 | Direct Quotation of the love-command as "the great and first commandment," paired with Lev 19:18 — and capped by the canon-hermeneutical claim unique to Matthew: "On these two commandments depend all the Law and the Prophets" (22:40). Matthew makes the Shema not merely the greatest command but the hermeneutical hinge on which the whole canon hangs — maximal hermeneutical visibility. |
Conscious demotion note (2026-06-09): Acts 4:32 previously held the fourth Critical slot. It is an Echo-grade corporate application meeting only the theological-density criterion loosely; Matthew 22:37-39 is a Direct Quotation carrying the canon-hermeneutical claim of 22:40. The Echo-over-Quotation anomaly flagged in the corpus audit has been resolved in favor of the quotation. Acts 4:32 remains in the §4 network as an unmarked entry.
The following IPs would strengthen this network if added. The first is flagged as a critical priority.
| Connection | Status | Priority |
|---|---|---|
| Deut 6:4 → 1 Corinthians 8:6 (Paul's split of the Shema; "one God, the Father… one Lord, Jesus Christ") | ✅ CREATED — IP. Bauckham's central exhibit for early Christological monotheism; the textual root of Pauline Christology | CRITICAL |
| Deut 6:5 → Deuteronomy 30:6 (and the wider intra-Deuteronomic reuse: 10:12; 11:1, 13, 22; 13:3; 30:16, 20) — the foundational heart-circumcision promise | ✅ CREATED (Deut 30:6, the prototype) — IP. Remaining intra-Deut verses still uncovered | High |
| Deut 6:5 → Joshua 22:5 (conquest-generation covenant test using full Shema-formula) | ✅ CREATED — IP | High |
| Deut 6:5 → 1 Kings 8:48 (Solomon's temple-dedication prayer envisioning exilic repentance in Shema-language) | ✅ CREATED — IP | Medium |
| Deut 6:5 → 2 Kings 23:25 (Josiah as the only canonical figure credited with fulfilling the Shema's three-fold demand) | ✅ CREATED — IP | High |
| Deut 6:5 → Jeremiah 4:4 (heart-circumcision prophetic call, building on Deut 30:6) | ✅ CREATED — IP | Medium |
| Deut 6:4 → Zechariah 14:9 (the only OT text outside the Shema itself to use YHWH ʾeḥād; eschatological universalization) | ✅ CREATED — IP | High |
| Deut 6:4 → James 2:19 ("you believe that God is one; you do well — even the demons believe") — explicit Shema citation in James | ✅ CREATED — IP | Medium |
| Deut 6:4 → Romans 3:30 ("since God is one, he will justify the circumcised and the uncircumcised through faith") — Pauline use of the Shema for Jew-Gentile inclusion | ✅ CREATED — IP | Medium |
| Deut 6:4 → 1 Timothy 2:5 ("there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus") | ✅ CREATED — IP | Medium |
| Deut 6:4 → Ephesians 4:5-6 ("one Lord, one faith, one baptism, one God and Father of all") — Pauline ecclesial reuse of the Shema's εἷς-clauses | ✅ CREATED — IP | Medium |
| Deut 6:4 → Mark 12:32 (the scribe's response to Jesus, affirming Jesus's Shema recitation: "You are right, Teacher, you have truly said that he is one, and there is no other besides him") | ✅ CREATED — IP | Medium |
| Deut 6:5 → Luke 10:27 (the lawyer's Shema citation in the Good Samaritan question — fourfold form: heart, soul, strength, mind) | ✅ CREATED — IP | Medium |
Of the original thirteen, all thirteen now have IP files (the Deut-intra-textual row is seeded with the foundational Deut 30:6 IP; the remaining intra-Deut verses 10:12; 11:1, 13, 22; 13:3; 30:16, 20 are still uncovered). One §3 row remains open: Jeremiah 32:39-41 ("I will give them one heart and one way") — not in this original gap list, flagged for a future IP.
| Source | Contribution |
|---|---|
| Richard Bauckham, Jesus and the God of Israel: God Crucified and Other Studies on the New Testament's Christology of Divine Identity (Eerdmans, 2008) | The foundational treatment of "Christological monotheism" and the NT inclusion of Jesus within the unique divine identity of the one God of the Shema; the central interpretation of 1 Cor 8:6 |
| Larry W. Hurtado, Lord Jesus Christ: Devotion to Jesus in Earliest Christianity (Eerdmans, 2003) | The historical-devotional argument that "high Christology" — including the Christological reformulation of the Shema — emerged within decades of the resurrection, not in late church development |
| G.K. Beale, A New Testament Biblical Theology (Baker, 2011) | The Shema in the inaugurated-eschatology framework; the corporate-Shema fulfillment in the Spirit-shaped church (Acts 4:32 in canonical context) |
| N.T. Wright, The Climax of the Covenant, Ch. 6 ("Monotheism, Christology and Ethics: 1 Corinthians 8") | Detailed exegesis of 1 Cor 8:6 as Christological Shema-reformulation |
| C.K. Barrett, The Gospel According to St John | Johannine Shema-Christology, esp. John 17:3 |
| Daniel I. Block, The Gospel According to Moses: Theological and Ethical Reflections on the Book of Deuteronomy | Deuteronomic context of the Shema and its intra-canonical career through the Deuteronomistic History |
| Patrick D. Miller, Deuteronomy (Interpretation commentary) | The Shema's position as the hermeneutical lens of Deuteronomic covenant |
← Home | ← Anchor Texts Index | Methodology: Anchor-Text Networks